Political
Science/Public Administration 5321; Spring,
2007; MWF 8:35-9:25; FAMB 203
Bob Huefner
581-6043
Email: robert.huefner@poli-sci.utah.edu
Web page:
http://www.poli-sci.utah.edu/~rhuef/
Course Purposes: That
participants further develop
their:
• Understanding of the politics of health and the health of politics,
• Understanding of problems, purposes, and processes of (health) policy,
• Familiarity with current issues and terminology of health policy,
• Abilities to predict and influence future (health) policy,
• Professional tools to analyze health policy choices and administer health services: data analysis and presentation (e.g. tables, statistical tools, graphics, analytic tools, and narrative); acquisition and appraisal of research and financial analysis (e.g. locating sources and assessing their products); communications (e.g. written and oral communications, group efforts, marketing, and negotiation); and professional presentation (e.g. résumé and memos/summaries)
Texts:
There is no text. Study
materials include:
•
• Academy for Health Services Research and Health Policy, Glossary (http://www.academyhealth.org/publications/glossary.htm).
•
Various newspapers, web connections, and library materials
Other materials
may be
assigned: on reserve, on the web, or distributed in class.
ASSIGNMENTS:
• Study team: Organize
and
submit names to Huefner (Wed.,
Jan. 10) of a two person study
team. Study team is to
prepare for
class discussions, critique draft
assignments, prepare a summary (paragraph) proposal for U S health
policy (Mon., Mar. 12) and
prepare for exams.
• Résumé: Update or prepare your
résumé, for seeking a position upon graduation. Share the
résumé with your study partner (Wed., Jan. 17).
Return other team member's résumé with
constructive critique (Fri.,
Jan. 19).
Submit your revised
résumé (Wed.,
Jan.
24). For assistance, see Office of
Career Services, 581-6186, room 350, Student Services Bldg.,
http://careers.utah.edu
• Experience: Prepare paragraph descriptions, with assessments
of what they say about the quality of health care, of two
personal health care experiences (one positive and one problematic)
that you are willing to share with the class. Discuss in your study
team in class (Wed., Jan. 10)
and revise and submit (Fri., Jan 12).
• Class participation is a primary means of learning, and the
course seeks constructive (including challenging)
discussion. If you have a special problem in
arriving at class on time (e.g. child care), discuss it with Huefner in
advance.
• Media Reviews (4) of items appearing during the previous week
in
a major news source listed in the course schedule. Select from the
assigned source what you find to be the
most important health policy issue related to the policy aspect
addressed that week. In about fifty words, address at least
the first
three of the following questions and be prepared to address all of them
in class discussion:
Why is this the key issue?
What pertinent facts (about
health and politics) are known?
What are the uncertainties
What are likely to be key policy
steps and actors?
What information, now known or
unknown and in whose hands, can improve policy?
Individuals will be called upon to
initiate the discussion. (If you can not attend a session, please
notify Huefner in advance.) All class members are invited to
participate in the discussion. Reviews will be scored as satisfactory
(75), comprehensive (85), or especially insightful (95).
• Quizzes (5) unannounced, beginning
of class. No make ups.
Scores from 0 to 5, with each class member's lowest score
changed
to 5.
• Research Results: (1) In class (Wed., Jan.24) choose a result from Research Activities published by
AHRQ (from copies distributed in class). Report to the class (in 3
sentences) the result, the source of the finding, and a question
related to the finding that deserves further investigation. Raise
a question deserving further investigation related to the finding
reported by the class member immediately ahead of you in the alphabet.
(2) Go to the web page of Research Activities and select
the PDF version of a report (any year) for the month of your birth and
from that select a finding of interest. Prepare a short paragraph
citing the month, year, page, and title of the finding, summarizing the
finding, identifying the source of the finding, and raising a
question related to the finding that deserves further investigation.
Give this (Fri., Feb.16) to
the class member immediately after you in the alphabet to
raise a second question
related to the finding that deserves further investigation (Wed., Feb 21).
Then do
research on the web and at the Eccles Library to answer as best you can
whether there has been further research on
the two questions raised and if so how well it answers the questions.
Write two short paragraphs summarizing your findings for the two
questions,
and submit
the completed (three paragraph) report (Fri.,
Mar.2). Limit you web/library research of the two
questions to three hours of your time. Include a footnote for your
completed report saying what sources were most helpful and what
problems were encountered in your research.
• Book comparison: Read
one of
the following books: •Complications
(Atul Gawande);
•Ashes to Ashes (Richard
Kluger); •A Civil Action
(Jonathan Harr);
•A
Question of
Intent (David Kesler); •A
Midwife's Tale (Laurel Thatcher Ulrich); •Medicine
&
Culture (Lynn Payer);
•Educated Guesses (Louise
Russell);
•To Err is Human (Inst. of
Med.); •Crossing
the Quality Chasm (Inst. of Med.); •Smoking
and Politics (Fritchler & Hoefler); •The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down
(Anne Fadiman); •Pathologies of Power (Paul
Farmer); •The
9/11 Commission Report; •The Great Influenza (John
Barry); or •China Syndrome (Karl Taro Greenfeld). Team with another
course
participant who is reading a different book to inform each other (by Wed., Apr. 4) of
how
the books relate to the questions listed above for the "Media Reviews"
assignment.
Then individually write and submit (Wed.,
Apr. 11) a comparison, in two readable pages,
of the perspectives provided by
these
two books, considering the "review" questions that you find most
significant. Inform Huefner (by
Friday, January 19) of the book selected and
the name of the other team member. Be prepared to discuss in class
your book and comparison.
GRADES will be based upon
the following
(there are no extra-credit projects):
• 10% Class Participation: entire semester
• 10% March
2 Research Results report
• 10% Media Reviews (4)
• 10% Quizzes (5)
• 15% Book
Comparison
• 15% Midterm Exam
• 30% Final Exam
No examination study guides,
beyond the "notes" on Huefner's web
page, will be distributed.
If you would like your final exam returned, Leave
a
stamped, addressed
envelope.